Baseline · day 0Trajectory · day 90

Human capability intelligence

Growth,
made visible.

The measurement layer for enterprise leadership. A baseline before the work begins, behavior tracked over time, and evidence of what actually changed.

Baseline before Evidence after Agnostic of coaches

The gap

Organizations spend millions developing their leaders. Almost none can say what it changed. The trust between a coach and a leader has to stay private, so the outcome goes unmeasured, and the spend goes undefended.

"What did the spend actually do?"

Budgets clear the board, then disappear into a gap where no one tracks whether behavior changed or performance moved.

"Which vendor do we standardize on?"

Every provider wants to pull you into its own system. Buyers are left stitching together tools that never share a source of truth.

"How do we measure without surveilling?"

You can't read the coaching conversation, and you shouldn't. But everything around it can be measured, with the right instruments and enough people using them.

The platform

A high-performance operating system for leadership.

Measure what leadership development actually produces. When matching is needed, Naru can provide that too.

i.

Measurement

A baseline before the work begins, behavior tracked after it. Change and return, translated into the language the boardroom already speaks.

  • Baseline read established before any engagement starts
  • Assessments short enough that people finish them: three to five minutes, not an hour
  • Mapped to the competency model your organization already uses
  • Team-level signals: attrition, performance, follow-through
  • A report the CFO can read without a translator
ii.

Matching, when it's needed

High participation is what makes the signal real, and the same signal makes the match right. Most leaders in a program already have someone. When one doesn't, the platform closes the gap.

  • Matching driven by a proprietary model
  • Each leader matched to development that fits their actual challenge
  • Works with internal mentors and incumbent vendors, not only our roster

The measurement layer

The work stays private.
The change doesn't have to.

No one reads the conversation between a coach and a leader. What gets measured is everything around it: participation, follow-through, team performance, attrition. Observable shifts, read at a cadence the board understands.

i.

Baseline before

Short assessments set the starting point, mapped to the competency model you already trust.

ii.

Tracked at 30 · 60 · 90

Competency shifts measured after the work, for the leader and the team they lead.

iii.

A CFO-ready report

Behavior change and return, stated in boardroom language.

iv.

One source of truth

Integrates the stack you run instead of replacing it. A layer, not a lock-in.

30 · 60 · 90 the cadence at which
change is measured

In market

A six-month enterprise pilot in development.

Following five working sessions with a major U.S. asset manager, the client has asked us to structure a six-month pilot. Vendor and security review are underway, with the next working session being scheduled.

Status · pilot in scoping

Pilot status

Working sessions heldfive
Pilot length requestedsix months
Entry pointmeasurement
Vendor & security reviewunderway

Client name withheld under NDA. Detail available on a walkthrough.

Naru Evidence

A report the CFO can actually read.

One page per program: return under three attribution scenarios, competency lift, retention, and program health. Shown here with demonstration data.

Spring Leadership Cohort  ·  50 leaders  ·  250 sessions Illustrative data
Program ROI
203.3%
at 50% attribution
Net benefit
$305,000
per program year
Competency lift
+21%
across 10 capabilities
Retention
94%
+10 pts from baseline

Return under three attribution scenarios

51.7%
Conservative · 25% attr.
203.3%
Default · 50% attr.
355.0%
Optimistic · 75% attr.
  • Retention in the measured cohort is 10 points above its own baseline.
  • 87% of sessions met the goal the leader set at the start.

Program health

Attendance95%
Engagement87%
NPS pulse94%
Completion82%
All employee data is aggregated and anonymized. Individual session detail is never exposed. Export PDF · board-ready

The roster, when you need it

World-class coaches, connected, not required.

The platform carries a vetted roster of world-class coaches, but the roster isn't the product. The product is the intelligence that puts your whole development stack to work: internal mentors, existing vendors, your own senior leaders.

When a leader does need a coach, the connection is a click away and already wired into the measurement layer. When they don't, the platform stands on its own.

Request a walkthrough

Powered by CoachFinder

Matching engineincluded
Vetted coach rosteron demand
Internal mentorssupported
Your existing vendorsintegrated

CoachFinder is the matching module inside the platform: the roster and connection layer, not the product you buy.

The people behind the model

Built by people who have measured this before.

The measurement model is developed with business-school faculty and practitioners who have run talent and performance at global institutions.

1,000+
Leaders, experience informing
the measurement architecture
3–5 min
Assessment length, built
for real participation
30·60·90
Days at which competency
shifts are measured
1
Source of truth, instead
of a stack that won't talk

The team pairs the architect behind a major technology company's opportunity-scoring system with a former global head of learning and development at a top-tier bank, now teaching at a leading European business school. Between them, a decade of hard-won lessons about what actually moves when you measure leadership.

For CHROs & heads of L&D

Stop defending the spend
with anecdotes.

See how a baseline, a 90-day cadence, and competency tracking turn development spend into a number the board can read.

Prefer email? david@coachfinder.ai